xTool F2 Ultra UV vs ComMarker Omni X UV: Comparing Flagship UV Laser Engravers
TL;DR: xTool F2 Ultra UV vs ComMarker Omni X UV
If youβre deciding between the xTool F2 Ultra UV and the ComMarker Omni X UV, the F2 Ultra UV stands out for its 48MP camera, speed, and larger marking area. Meanwhile, the Omni X UV is a more mature, enclosed Class 1 UV engraver with better vertical clearance, stronger industrial pedigree, and a UV platform refined over several generations.
Bottom line: For most small businesses and serious makers, the ComMarker Omni X UV is the better long-term investment thanks to its safety, reliability, and proven UV technology.
Pricing Overview
xTool F2 Ultra UV (Pre-Sale)
-
$50 deposit;Β $3,999 pre-sale price
-
Ships late November
-
First UV engraver in the xTool ecosystem
ComMarker Omni X UV (Black Friday Sale)
-
$3,999 all-in price
-
Ships immediately
-
Available in 5W and 10W versions
1. Introduction: Why Compare These Two UV Laser Engravers?
UV laser engravers deliver exceptional precision on plastics, coated metals, electronics, and small industrial components. As makers and businesses expand into high-detail personalization and product marking, compact UV machines like the xTool F2 Ultra UV and ComMarker Omni X UV have become must-consider options.
Both machines offer serious engraving performance, but they take very different design approaches. xTool brings user-friendly software and a camera-assisted workflow, while ComMarker brings industrial experience and a fully enclosed Class 1 system. This comparison breaks down every major difference so you can choose the ideal UV engraver for your work.


2. Quick Specification Comparison
| Feature | xTool F2 Ultra UV | ComMarker Omni X UV |
|---|---|---|
| Laser Power | 5 W | 5 W or 10 W |
| Integrated Camera | 48 MP | None |
| Engraving Speed | 15,000 mm/s | 10,000 mm/s |
| Work Area | 200 Γ 200 mm | 150 Γ 150 mm |
| Extended Work Area | Up to 500 mm | Up to 400 mm |
| Max Object Height | 150 mm | 235 mm |
| Safety Class | Class 4 | Class 1 |
| Autofocus | Yes | Yes |
| Weight | 22.5 kg | 32 kg |
| Price | $3,999 | $3,999 |
3. Design & Build Quality
3.1 Footprint, Weight & Portability
The xTool F2 Ultra UV has a lighter 22.5 kg frame that feels modern and easy to reposition around a studio or workshop. Itβs designed with creators in mindβcompact, clean, and flexible.
The ComMarker Omni X UV, weighing 32 kg, is more industrial and deliberately solid. Its reinforced construction provides better vibration resistance and long-term durability. For commercial applications or continuous production work, this heavier build is an advantage rather than a drawback.
3.2 Enclosure & Safety System
Safety is one of the biggest differences between these machines. The F2 Ultra UV is a Class 4 system, requiring protective eyewear and a controlled environment.
The Omni X UV is fully enclosed and certified Class 1, meaning it is safe to operate without additional PPE. This makes it suitable for schools, retail environments, corporate offices, and shared maker spaces.
4. Laser Performance & Power Options
4.1 UV Laser Power
The xTool F2 Ultra UV is offered only as a 5W UV laser. For most precision applications, 5W UV is more than sufficient.
The Omni X UV provides 5W and 10W options, giving makers more headroom for deeper engraving, faster marking, and heavier-duty workflows.
4.2 Impact on Engraving Depth & Material Range
Both machines excel at engraving plastics, coated substrates, metal surfaces, and electronics. However, the 10W Omni X UV handles high-volume marking and deeper engraving noticeably better, making it ideal for industrial applications or serialized batch production.
4.3 Engraving Quality & Precision Differences
Engraving clarity is high on both systems, though the F2 Ultra UVβs camera enhances placement accuracy. Meanwhile, ComMarkerβs multi-generation UV architecture gives the Omni X UV exceptionally consistent beam stability.
5. Speed, Accuracy & Productivity
5.1 Engraving Speed
The F2 Ultra UV reaches up to 15,000 mm/s, giving it one of the fastest scanning speeds in the portable UV engraver category.
The Omni X UV caps at 10,000 mm/s, still highly respectable and suitable for commercial workflows.
5.2 Impact on Batch Production
In real-world use, speed is just one part of throughput. The Omni X UVβs stability, predictable autofocus, and industrial-grade construction make it a strong performer for repetitive or serialized productionβwhere consistency matters just as much as scanning speed.
6. Working Area & Object Size Capabilities
6.1 Marking Area
The F2 Ultra UV offers a 200 Γ 200 mm field, making it better for large flat items like plaques, plates, and signage. The Omni X UV provides a 150 Γ 150 mm field.
6.2 Extended Work Area
With extended travel, the F2 Ultra UV reaches up to 500 mm (with the "conveyor"), while the Omni X UV extends to 400 mm (with the "slide extension"). Again, xTool wins on max surface width.
6.3 Maximum Object Height
This is where the Omni X UV shines. With 235 mm of vertical clearance (vs 150 mm on the F2 Ultra), it accommodates tall bottles, product housings, industrial components, and bulkier objects that simply donβt fit under the xTool.
6.4 Real-World Impact
In practice, makers tend to encounter height limitations more frequently than surface area limitations. This gives the Omni X UV a meaningful advantage for shops handling diverse or irregular objects.
7. Camera & Alignment Systems
7.1 Integrated Vision System
The F2 Ultra UV's 48MP camera provides real-time previews directly within xTool Creative Space. This makes positioning intuitive and reduces the need for test runs.
The Omni X UV does not include a camera; instead, it follows the industry-standard method of fixtures and jigs.
7.2 Workflow & Accuracy Advantages
For artists, personalization shops, and anyone frequently engraving different items, the camera system is extremely helpful. It simplifies alignment and speeds up custom or one-off jobs.
7.3 When Camera Is or Isnβt Necessary
For repetitive production runs, jigs outperform cameras in speed and reliability. This is why most commercial UV marking systemsβincluding ComMarkerβs higher-end unitsβdo not depend on integrated cameras.
8. Autofocus Systems
8.1 Autofocus Capabilities: Both Machines
Both engravers offer fast, accurate autofocus to ensure optimal engraving performance.
8.2 Differences in Implementation & Ease of Use
xTool ties autofocus into its camera-centered workflow, offering a guided experience for beginners. The Omni X UVβs autofocus feels more industrial, operating smoothly inside the enclosure and favoring reliability over UI flashiness.
9. Software Ecosystem: XCS vs ComMarker Studio
9.1 xTool Creative Space (XCS)
XCS is visual, intuitive, and tailor-made for artists and creators. It integrates directly with the F2 Ultraβs camera, making object placement easy and fast.
9.2 ComMarker Studio
ComMarker Studio provides granular control similar to what youβd find in fiber marking software. Itβs built for technicians, engineers, and makers who need precise parameter tuning. The Omni X is also compatible with Lightburn, the industry standard software for laser engravers.
9.3 Which Software Is Best for Which User?
Beginners and camera-focused workflows benefit from XCS. Professionals running batch production or industrial marking often prefer ComMarker ability to work with Lightburn.
10. Manufacturer Comparison: xTool vs ComMarker
10.1 Company Background & UV-Laser Track Record
xTool has earned a strong reputation for beginner-friendly diode and COβ lasersβbut the F2 Ultra UV is their first UV model.
ComMarker, by contrast, has produced multiple UV and fiber systems over several generations. Their technology has been widely adopted by studios, labs, and commercial engravers.
10.2 Support, Service & Ecosystem Maturity
xTool provides one of the most polished user ecosystems in the laser industry. ComMarkerβs ecosystem is more technical but highly stable, especially for UV and fiber workflows.
10.3 Reliability, Field Feedback & Long-Term Use
Since ComMarkerβs UV systems have been deployed for years, their performance is well documented. xToolβs F2 Ultra UVβwhile promisingβis still a first-generation UV machine.
10.4 Risk vs Confidence
Choosing the F2 Ultra UV means adopting exciting new features with less historical reliability data. Choosing the Omni X UV means opting for a flagship UV system built on multiple prior UV generations.
11. Final Recommendation: Which One Should You Buy?
Choose the xTool F2 Ultra UV if you want:
-
Camera-assisted engraving
-
A larger marking area
-
The fastest scanning speeds
-
Deep integration with xToolβs ecosystem
-
A lighter, more mobile machine
Choose the ComMarker Omni X UV if you want:
-
A proven, industrial-grade UV engraver
-
Fully enclosed Class 1 safety
-
The ability to engrave taller objects
-
Optional 10W UV power
-
Immediate availability at the same price
Our Verdict
For most makers, shops, and businesses needing dependable UV engraving, the ComMarker Omni X UV is the stronger, more future-proof choice. Its safety certification, taller object capacity, and established UV platform make it a safer long-term investmentβespecially given the equal price of $3,999.
Leave a comment